JOURNAL: Comparative life cycle assessments of laboratory and Pilot-scale Mechanochemical processes for producing carbonated mineral products as cement substitutes

Summary

Authors:

Mohamed Katish
Xinyuan Ke
Phil Renforth

University of Bath
Heriot-Watt University

Comparative life cycle assessments of laboratory and Pilot-scale Mechanochemical processes for producing carbonated mineral products as cement substitutes

Cleaner Environmental Systems

December 2024

This paper explores how using carbonated mineral products in cement can help reduce carbon emissions and improve durability. It focuses on replacing part of the cement with mineral carbonated biomass fly ash (BFA) and assesses its environmental benefits. The study found that incorporating 20% BFA could lower cement’s carbon footprint by 33% per year. Machine learning models predicted CO2 absorption and energy use, showing better efficiency at larger scales. However, challenges remain, such as lower material strength and limitations in data modelling. Overall, the research highlights BFA’s potential for greener cement but calls for further optimisation.

Contact

IDRIC
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS
info@idric.org

LinkedIn

YouTube

Sign up to our General, Policy and ECRA newsletters to keep up to date with all our latest developments.

Sign Up

Funded by

EPSRC

© IDRIC 2022 | Website: Tangent & Duncan Weddell & Co